E purchase (��)-Imazamox tertile increased (Figure 2A). Particularly, in a subgroup with both LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the third tertile, the adjusted odds ratio was 5.60 (95 CI: [1.25?.14], P = 0.013), as compared to the reference subgroup (Figure 2A). In contrast, when the LDL cholesterol tertile was similarly analyzed in association with the HDL cholesterol tertile, such an increase in radiographic MedChemExpress ML-281 progression was not noted (Figure 2B). In fact, the adjusted odds ratios affected by HDL cholesterol tertile were 1.0 to 1.7 in all nine subgroups, which were much lower than the third tertile of LDL cholesterol only (OR = 2.831), suggesting that HDL 15481974 cholesterolemia is rather protective for radiographic progression linked to LDL cholesterolemia. Together, these data indicate that LDL cholesterolemia interacts with triglyceridemia and HDL cholesterolemia for RA progression. We next wanted to compare the influence of LDL cholesterolemia with that of conventional risk factors for RA progression, including time-integrated ESR, time-integrated CRP, the presence of rheumatoid factor, and the presence of ACPA. To address this issue, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the timeintegrated LDL cholesterol levels in comparison with conventional factors. When the ROC curve for each variable was analyzed, the area under the curve (AUC) of time-integrated LDL cholesterol was 0.609 [95 CI: 0.569?.720], which was comparable to that of the time-integrated CRP (0.648, [0.536?.684]), time-integrated ESR (0.631, [0.528?.711]), RF (0.634, [0.547?.688]), and ACPA (0.648, [0.537?.683]) (Figure 2C). No difference in AUC was found between time-integrated LDL cholesterol and time-integrated CRP (P = 0.533). In addition, on the basis of the null distribution of AUC (100,000 random permutation of data), one-tailed P values for all variables were P,0.005. These results suggest that cumulative LDL cholesterolemia helps clinicians to predict disease progression as efficiently as conventional prognostic factors of RA.LDL Cholesterolemia, Adipocytokines, and Disease ProgressionEvidence is emerging that adipocytokines with pro-inflammatory activity, mainly produced from adipose tissues, are increased in RA patients [17,28,29], and their levels correlate with disease activity and radiographic progression [18,19,30?4]. Our findings that LDL cholesterol showed an independent association with radiographic progression prompted us to investigate whether adipocytokines, including leptin and adiponectin, are involved in this association. The results showed that both adiponectin (log transformed value:c = 0.234, P = 0.001) and leptin (log transformed value: c = 0.211, P = 0.002) levels showed positive correlations with radiographic severity (Figure S2A and S2B). Moreover, serum leptin concentrations also correlated well withDyslipidemia and Radiographic Progression in RAFigure 1. Changes in ESR, CRP level, and DAS28 during the follow-up period according to time-integrated lipid tertile. Patients with LDL cholesterol levels in the third tertile had persistently higher ESR levels (main effect of group: P,0.001, main effect of time: P,0.001, interaction effect: P,0.001), CRP levels (main effect of group: P,0.001, main effect of time: P,0.001, interaction effect: P,0.001), and DAS28 scores (main effect of group: P = 0.014, main effect of time: P = 0.016, interaction effect: P,0.001) than those with levels in the first tertile. Patients with triglycerides levels in the third ter.E tertile increased (Figure 2A). Particularly, in a subgroup with both LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the third tertile, the adjusted odds ratio was 5.60 (95 CI: [1.25?.14], P = 0.013), as compared to the reference subgroup (Figure 2A). In contrast, when the LDL cholesterol tertile was similarly analyzed in association with the HDL cholesterol tertile, such an increase in radiographic progression was not noted (Figure 2B). In fact, the adjusted odds ratios affected by HDL cholesterol tertile were 1.0 to 1.7 in all nine subgroups, which were much lower than the third tertile of LDL cholesterol only (OR = 2.831), suggesting that HDL 15481974 cholesterolemia is rather protective for radiographic progression linked to LDL cholesterolemia. Together, these data indicate that LDL cholesterolemia interacts with triglyceridemia and HDL cholesterolemia for RA progression. We next wanted to compare the influence of LDL cholesterolemia with that of conventional risk factors for RA progression, including time-integrated ESR, time-integrated CRP, the presence of rheumatoid factor, and the presence of ACPA. To address this issue, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the timeintegrated LDL cholesterol levels in comparison with conventional factors. When the ROC curve for each variable was analyzed, the area under the curve (AUC) of time-integrated LDL cholesterol was 0.609 [95 CI: 0.569?.720], which was comparable to that of the time-integrated CRP (0.648, [0.536?.684]), time-integrated ESR (0.631, [0.528?.711]), RF (0.634, [0.547?.688]), and ACPA (0.648, [0.537?.683]) (Figure 2C). No difference in AUC was found between time-integrated LDL cholesterol and time-integrated CRP (P = 0.533). In addition, on the basis of the null distribution of AUC (100,000 random permutation of data), one-tailed P values for all variables were P,0.005. These results suggest that cumulative LDL cholesterolemia helps clinicians to predict disease progression as efficiently as conventional prognostic factors of RA.LDL Cholesterolemia, Adipocytokines, and Disease ProgressionEvidence is emerging that adipocytokines with pro-inflammatory activity, mainly produced from adipose tissues, are increased in RA patients [17,28,29], and their levels correlate with disease activity and radiographic progression [18,19,30?4]. Our findings that LDL cholesterol showed an independent association with radiographic progression prompted us to investigate whether adipocytokines, including leptin and adiponectin, are involved in this association. The results showed that both adiponectin (log transformed value:c = 0.234, P = 0.001) and leptin (log transformed value: c = 0.211, P = 0.002) levels showed positive correlations with radiographic severity (Figure S2A and S2B). Moreover, serum leptin concentrations also correlated well withDyslipidemia and Radiographic Progression in RAFigure 1. Changes in ESR, CRP level, and DAS28 during the follow-up period according to time-integrated lipid tertile. Patients with LDL cholesterol levels in the third tertile had persistently higher ESR levels (main effect of group: P,0.001, main effect of time: P,0.001, interaction effect: P,0.001), CRP levels (main effect of group: P,0.001, main effect of time: P,0.001, interaction effect: P,0.001), and DAS28 scores (main effect of group: P = 0.014, main effect of time: P = 0.016, interaction effect: P,0.001) than those with levels in the first tertile. Patients with triglycerides levels in the third ter.