Ldrich), each mouse was injected intravenously with an approximate 3.7 MBq of Microcystin-LR biological activity 18F-FDG. Micro-PET imaging and analysis were performed using a MOSAIC animal PET scanner (Philips medical systems) with attached software (version 9.4). A conventional imaging of 10 min duration was performed in the prone position at 1 h post injection and a delayed imaging ofRadiolabeling of 99mTc-RRLThe concentration of SnCl2 solution acted as a decisive role in the process of radiolabeling. The best conditions in this experiment for radiolabeling of 99mTc-RRL were 5 mg SnCl2, 300 mg sodium tartrate, 250 mL as the reaction volume and 1 hour as the reaction time (Fig. 3). Under the set of conditions, average labeling efficiencies of 76.9 64.5 (n = 6) and the specific radioactivities of up to 1480 kBq/mg were obtained within 60 min at room temperature. 47931-85-1 web Radiochemical purities of more than 96 after purification were obtained. The labeling efficiency and radiochemical purity of 99mTc-RRL were calculated by paper chromatography on Xinhua no. 1 filter paper, with acetone and ethanol: ammonia: water (2:1:5) as the mobile phase. With acetone as the mobile phase, 99mTcpertechnetate migrated with the solvent, whereas 99mTc-RRL and other labeled colloids remained at the origin. Otherwise, with the ethanol: ammonia: water (2:1:5) as the mobile phase, 99mTcpertechnetate and 99mTc-RRL migrated with the solvent, whereas and labeled colloids remained at the origin (Table 1).In vitro StabilityThe radiochemical purity of 99mTc-RRL under different conditions was .93 periodically over 6 h (Fig. 4).A Novel99mTc-Labeled Molecular ProbeFigure 1. HPLC result. HPLC result of RRL showed there only one peak, indicating the good quality of synthesis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061043.gBiodistribution of 99mTc-RRL in HepG2 XenograftBearing Nude MiceBiodistribution data were shown in Tables 2 and Figure 5. At different time phase after injection of 99mTc-RRL, the probe accumulated primarily in the stomach and kidneys, followed by the tumor. None of the other organs (and tissues) investigated showed high concentration. In addition, the biodistribution of 99m Tc-RRL was characterized by quick blood clearance, with 6.97 ID/g remaining 15 min after injection and 2.0 ID/g remaining at 4 h. The specific uptake of 99mTc-RRL in tumor increased after 15 min 23727046 and remained at the relatively high level until the 6 h time point after injection. As a result, the ratio of tumor-to-nontumor (T/NT) accumulation after injection of 99mTc-RRL was significantly higher, especially at the 4 h time point. The ratio of tumorto-muscle exceeded 6.5, and the ratio of tumor-to-blood reached 1.95 at 4 h. The ratio of tumor-to-liver reached 1.98, and was significant higher than blocking and control group (P,0.05) (Fig. 5A). In blocking group, the uptake of radiolabeled probe distributed more in heart, spleen, lung, stomach and small intestine, but less in tumor (P,0.05) (Fig. 5B). In control group, data of blood, heart, spleen, lung was similar with experimental group (P.0.05). Thedata of tumor showed significant difference between control and experimental group (P,0.05), but similar with blocking group (P.0.05).Tumor size versus tumor uptakeIn this study, we used a total of 15 liver cancer-bearing mice to explore the relationship between the tumor size and ID uptake of 99mTc-RRL at 4 h post injection. As illustrated in Figure 6, there was a linear relationship between the tumor size (0.1?.2 g, n = 15) and the ID up.Ldrich), each mouse was injected intravenously with an approximate 3.7 MBq of 18F-FDG. Micro-PET imaging and analysis were performed using a MOSAIC animal PET scanner (Philips medical systems) with attached software (version 9.4). A conventional imaging of 10 min duration was performed in the prone position at 1 h post injection and a delayed imaging ofRadiolabeling of 99mTc-RRLThe concentration of SnCl2 solution acted as a decisive role in the process of radiolabeling. The best conditions in this experiment for radiolabeling of 99mTc-RRL were 5 mg SnCl2, 300 mg sodium tartrate, 250 mL as the reaction volume and 1 hour as the reaction time (Fig. 3). Under the set of conditions, average labeling efficiencies of 76.9 64.5 (n = 6) and the specific radioactivities of up to 1480 kBq/mg were obtained within 60 min at room temperature. Radiochemical purities of more than 96 after purification were obtained. The labeling efficiency and radiochemical purity of 99mTc-RRL were calculated by paper chromatography on Xinhua no. 1 filter paper, with acetone and ethanol: ammonia: water (2:1:5) as the mobile phase. With acetone as the mobile phase, 99mTcpertechnetate migrated with the solvent, whereas 99mTc-RRL and other labeled colloids remained at the origin. Otherwise, with the ethanol: ammonia: water (2:1:5) as the mobile phase, 99mTcpertechnetate and 99mTc-RRL migrated with the solvent, whereas and labeled colloids remained at the origin (Table 1).In vitro StabilityThe radiochemical purity of 99mTc-RRL under different conditions was .93 periodically over 6 h (Fig. 4).A Novel99mTc-Labeled Molecular ProbeFigure 1. HPLC result. HPLC result of RRL showed there only one peak, indicating the good quality of synthesis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061043.gBiodistribution of 99mTc-RRL in HepG2 XenograftBearing Nude MiceBiodistribution data were shown in Tables 2 and Figure 5. At different time phase after injection of 99mTc-RRL, the probe accumulated primarily in the stomach and kidneys, followed by the tumor. None of the other organs (and tissues) investigated showed high concentration. In addition, the biodistribution of 99m Tc-RRL was characterized by quick blood clearance, with 6.97 ID/g remaining 15 min after injection and 2.0 ID/g remaining at 4 h. The specific uptake of 99mTc-RRL in tumor increased after 15 min 23727046 and remained at the relatively high level until the 6 h time point after injection. As a result, the ratio of tumor-to-nontumor (T/NT) accumulation after injection of 99mTc-RRL was significantly higher, especially at the 4 h time point. The ratio of tumorto-muscle exceeded 6.5, and the ratio of tumor-to-blood reached 1.95 at 4 h. The ratio of tumor-to-liver reached 1.98, and was significant higher than blocking and control group (P,0.05) (Fig. 5A). In blocking group, the uptake of radiolabeled probe distributed more in heart, spleen, lung, stomach and small intestine, but less in tumor (P,0.05) (Fig. 5B). In control group, data of blood, heart, spleen, lung was similar with experimental group (P.0.05). Thedata of tumor showed significant difference between control and experimental group (P,0.05), but similar with blocking group (P.0.05).Tumor size versus tumor uptakeIn this study, we used a total of 15 liver cancer-bearing mice to explore the relationship between the tumor size and ID uptake of 99mTc-RRL at 4 h post injection. As illustrated in Figure 6, there was a linear relationship between the tumor size (0.1?.2 g, n = 15) and the ID up.