Tients underwent a posterior medial oblique process (Figure), whereas the remaining fourteen patients underwent a modified posterior lateral procedure PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475699 (Figure).Thirteen patients underwent bilateral fusion procedures (Figures ,) in which a cage was inserted into both sacroiliac joints, even though six sufferers had a correct side only fusion procedure, and one patient had a left side only fusion process.Within the case of the bilateral procedure, one particular patient had operations for either side performed on different dates.A view of both joints showing the trajectory from the fusion procedures is shown in Figure .The raw procedural information is presented in Table .FIGURE Axial CT showing trajectory of procedureNo. Age Sex F F F F F F F F FODI Score PSR Type of Fusion Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Ideal Right Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral, dd BilateralFusion Good results Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesFollowup (Months) Complications None None None None None None None None NoneProcedure Variety Medial oblique Lateral Lateral Lateral Lateral Lateral Lateral Lateral Lateral Beck et al.Cureus e.DOI .cureus.of F F F M F F M F F M F Left Suitable Bilateral Bilateral Proper Bilateral Appropriate Appropriate Bilateral Bilateral BilateralYes Yes Not left Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes None None Left cage overpenetrated None None None None None None None GNF-7 Protocol NoneLateral Medial oblique Lateral Medial oblique Lateral Medial oblique Medial oblique Lateral Medial oblique Lateral LateralTABLE Procedural Facts and Benefits by PatientPSR Procedure Satisfaction Rating, M male, F female, dd distinctive datesResultsThe average estimated blood loss within this method was mL or less.Typical length of keep was .days (1 patient stayed two days, two sufferers went dwelling exactly the same day as their surgery, and all other patients have been released the day after their surgery).Fusion, defined as radiographic proof of trabecular bone bridging, was present in out of joints, to get a fusion success rate of ..1 joint approached with the posterior lateral method did not fuse as the cage was placed also far into the ala and lost connection together with the ilium.There were no other important surgical complications.Specifically, there have been no infections, no bleeding events, no reoperations, and no healthcare complications.The average procedure satisfaction rating (PSR) (as measured on a sliding scale with becoming the least satisfactory and being essentially the most satisfactory) was .(Figure).A rating of was thought of unsatisfactory while a rating of was regarded as satisfactory.Six patients rated the process the highest probable worth of although individuals gave a score of or higher.This left only five individuals using a score of reduced than .As can be seen in Table , the patients who gave unsatisfactory scores all received the posterolateral procedure.Beck et al.Cureus e.DOI .cureus.ofFIGURE Frequency of PSR PSR Procedure Satisfaction RatingAmong the sufferers who responded for the postsurgical followup questions, individuals indicated they would elect to possess the surgery once again, and those same patients responded that they would propose the SI joint fusion procedure to other folks with equivalent low back discomfort problems.The remaining 4 individuals who responded to the postsurgical followup inquiries indicated they would not elect to have the surgery again, nor would they recommend the surgery to other folks.The ODI was applied to all sufferers on a onetime basis upon followup to assess general wellness perceptions of sufferers.