Id differentiation major response 88 (MyD88), MyD88, (A) Protein expression myeloid differentiation vs. other groups with distinctive symbols (, ), p 0.001. (B) Protein expression of TNF receptor vs. other groups with various symbols (, ), p 0.001. (B) Protein expression of TNF receptor connected factor 6 (TRAF6), vs. other groups with various symbols (, ), p 0.001. (C) Protein associated element six (TRAF6), vs. other groups with distinctive symbols (, ), p 0.001. (C) Protein expression of phosphorylated (p)-IKB-, vs. other groups with distinctive symbols (, ), p 0.001. expression of phosphorylated (p)-IKB-, vs. other groups with distinctive symbols (, ), p 0.001. (D) Protein expression of nuclear factor-B (NF-B), vs. other groups with diverse symbols (, ), (D) Protein expression of nuclear factor-B (NF-B), vs. other groups with diverse symbols (, ), p 0.001. (E) Protein expression of phosphorylated tumor necrosis element alpha (TNF-), vs. other p 0.001. (E) Protein expression of ), p 0.001. (F) Protein expression of interleukin (IL)-1 vs. groups with various symbols (, phosphorylated tumor necrosis aspect alpha (TNF-), vs. other groups with with distinct symbols (, 0.001. (F) Protein expression of interleukin vs. other groups other groupsdifferent symbols (, ), p ), p 0.001. (G) Protein expression of IL-6, (IL)-1 vs. other groups with unique symbols ), p (H) Protein expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMPwith distinctive symbols (, ), p(,0.001. 0.001. (G) Protein expression of IL-6, vs. other groups with 9), vs. other groups), p distinctive symbols (, ), p 0.001. (I) Protein expression of Sudan IV medchemexpress induced nitric unique symbols (, with 0.001. (H) Protein expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), vs. oxide groups with various symbols (, ), p diverse symbolsexpression of induced nitric oxide other synthase (iNOS), vs. other groups with 0.001. (I) Protein (, ), p 0.001. All statistical analyses had been(iNOS), vs.by one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni 0.001. All statistical analyses synthase performed other groups with different symbols (, ), p many comparison post hoc test (n = six for each group). Symbols (, , ) indicate significance many comparison = extracorpowere performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni (at 0.05 level). ECSW post hoc test true shock wave; RBdSMCs = rat bladder smooth muscle cells. (n = 6 for every group). Symbols (, , ) indicate significance (at 0.05 level). ECSW = extracorporeal shock wave; RBdSMCs = rat bladder smooth muscle cells.three.three. Effect of ECSW Therapy on Regulating the Cell-Stress Signaling in HBdSMCs The protein expressions of ASK1, p-MKK4, p-MKK7, ERK1/2, p-JNK, p-p38 and p-53, seven indices of cell-stress response signaling, had been drastically elevated moreso in G2 than in G1 and G3, and considerably reversed in G4 (all p 0.0001) however they showed no distinction involving G1 and G3 (Figure three).three.3. Effect of ECSW Therapy on Regulating the Cell-Stress Signaling in HBdSMCs The protein expressions of ASK1, p-MKK4, p-MKK7, ERK1/2, p-JNK, p-p38 and p53, seven indices of cell-stress response signaling, have been drastically increased moreso in Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1391 G2 than in G1 and G3, and significantly reversed in G4 (all p 0.0001) however they showed no distinction among G1 and G3 (Figure 3).7 ofFigure 3. ECSW therapy regulated the cell-stress signaling in RBdSMCs. (A) Protein expression of Figure 3. ECSW therapy regulated the cell-stress signaling in R.