Ere higher risk rating to high-probability ow-consequence events, as these events have been considrisk rating to high-probability ow-consequence events, as these events were considrisk rating of greater concern, as shown in Figureevents, as these events were regarded to become to high-probability ow-consequence A5. ered to be of greater concern, as shown in Figure A5. ered to become of higher concern, as shown in Figure A5. ered to become of higher concern, as shown in Figure A5.Figure A5. Colour-coded risk matrix following application of hazard aversion. Figure A5. Colour-coded danger matrix following application of hazard aversion. Figure A5. Colour-coded threat matrix following application of hazard aversion. Figure A5. Colour-coded threat matrix following application of hazard aversion.7. 7. 7. 7.Following the application of important hazard aversion, the risk matrix was tension tested Following the application of big hazard aversion, the threat matrix was anxiety tested Following the application of important hazard aversion, the threat matrix was stress tested Following the application of important hazard aversion, the danger matrix was pressure tested by evaluating its efficiency inin diverse scenarios and evaluating what threat risk by evaluating its overall performance indifferent scenarios and evaluating what the the maits overall performance different scenarios and evaluating what the risk maby by evaluating its overall performance in diverse scenarios and evaluating what the threat matrix toldtold user.user.evaluation showed that the that the threat ratings from Figure A5 the user.The evaluation showed that theyielded yielded danger ratings from matrix the the The The evaluation showed yielded risk ratings from Figure A5 trix told trix told the user. The evaluation showed that the yielded danger ratings from Figure A5 for the `Slight’ and `Slight’ and `Minor’ consequence rating columns were also higher. Figure A5 for the `Minor’ consequence rating columns had been also higher. Some amendfor the `Slight’ and `Minor’ consequence rating columns had been also higher. Some amendfor the `Slight’ and `Minor’ consequence rating columns had been also high. Some amendments were created to wererisk matrixthe riskwas strain tested again. This resulted in Some amendments the threat matrix and it was stress tested once again. This resulted in matrix and it was stress tested once more. ments have been produced for the produced to and to ments have been maderiskthe danger in Figure A6.it was stress tested once again. This resulted inside the final example riskmatrix matrix and it in Figure A6. Thisfinal instance final example danger matrix resulted inside the matrix in Figure A6. the the final instance risk matrix in Figure A6.Figure A6. Example colour-coded danger matrix. Figure A6. Instance colour-coded risk matrix. Figure A6. Example colour-coded threat matrix. Figure A6. Instance colour-coded risk matrix.Minerals 2021, 11,34 ofReceived: 4 October 2021 Accepted: 4 November 2021 Published: 11 NovemberPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.3-Chloro-5-hydroxybenzoic acid web Copyright: 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This short article is definitely an open access report distributed beneath the terms and situations on the Inventive Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (licenses/by/ four.0/).Mineral sands, also commonly called heavy minerals due to their somewhat higher distinct QX-314 Biological Activity density in comparison with sand (more than four kg/m3), are an important source of many titanium raw supplies and zircon. These metals and their oxides have becom.