Ten equal rewards and a single evil act will incur only one particular equal penalty. Woe, thus, to these whose one-to-one penalties outdo their ten-fold rewards. Allah has said, “The great deeds get rid of those which are evil” [11:14], as well as the Prophet (peace be on him) mentioned, “Do good right after evil so that it might wipe out the latter. (Al-Izz 2000, pp. 2778) Even though the Balance doctrine represents the normative orthodox belief with regards to humans’ fate inside the afterlife, the present study assumes that Muslims are likely to think in GNE-371 Purity & Documentation Purgatory as a personal destiny. That is, he or she will enter Purgatory just before entering Paradise. Whilst scant empirical evidence of purgatory beliefs amongst Muslims exists, observational information taken by the authors from their operate over quite a few years with young Muslims led to this hypothesis. The existing study set out to test this hypothesis, andReligions 2021, 12,four ofdrawing on a cognitive science of religion theoretical frame, delivers an initial explanation as to why these beliefs might exist. 2.two. Purgatory and Proportionality RP101988 Protocol Baumard and Boyer (2013) recommend that the doctrine of Purgatory arose because of cognitive tendency, specifically the tendency to proportionality. According to the authors, in moralizing religions, fantastic deeds are rewarded and undesirable deeds are punished, either in this planet or inside the afterlife, and in both situations, rewards and punishments are proportional to excellent and misdeeds, that is why some religions imagined Purgatory for souls who didn’t deserve outright salvation. Proportionality evolved evolutionarily throughout the human endeavor to establish prosperous relationships with others to ensure humanity’s survival. Baumard and Boyer (2013) reviewed several observations that match their hypothesis. Initial, economic games and surveys show that there’s a human tendency for proportionality amongst contributions and distributions (Cappelen et al. 2010; Jakiela 2015; Konow 2000; Marshall et al. 1999; Gurven 2004; Alvard 2004). Second, empirical experiments also show that in mutual help, there’s proportionality involving expenses and benefits (Baron and Miller 2000; Clark and Jordan 2002; Alvard 2004). Third, research indicate that the aim of punishment just isn’t to deter the criminal, but rather to attain justice (Baron 1993; Carlsmith et al. 2002; Johnson 2009; Chavez and Bicchieri 2013; Baumard 2010; Hoebel 1964) via the proportionality among harm and punishment (Robinson et al. 2007; Baumard and Lienard 2011). The proportionality tendency can also be the cause why folks associate misfortune with misdeeds (Baumard and Chevallier 2012). Ultimately, developmental studies show that infants as young as 15 months can detect inequity (Sloane et al. 2012; Schmidt and Sommerville 2011), and 3-year-olds predict distributions in proportion to merit (Baumard et al. 2011; Kanngiesser et al. 2010). The previous two sections clarify the contradiction amongst the doctrine of Purgatory plus the doctrine of balance. While the doctrine of Purgatory supported by a cognitive bias, asserts that every single sin must be punished to get a person as a way to be purified ahead of entering Heaven, the doctrine of Balance states that an individual can enter Heaven with no getting purified of his sins due to the fact his superior deeds outweigh his undesirable deeds. Hence, is it probable for the doctrine of Purgatory to spread amongst Muslims despite its contradiction using the doctrine of balance, despite the fact that the doctrine of balance is reflective of normative theology two.three. Purgatory as.