N MeV), XRD intensity degradation (YXD ), E = E-E (power loss in carbon foil of one hundred nm) (MeV) and BMS-986094 web electronic (Se ) and nuclear (Sn ) stopping powers in keV/nm and projected variety Rp calculated working with SRIM2013. Sputtering yield Ysp from [60]. Final results by very low power (one hundred keV Ne) ion can also be provided. Power Ion (MeV)58 Ni 136 Xe 136 Xe 20 NeYXD (10-12 cm2 ) 0.twelve 0.38 0.E (MeV) 89 99 198 0.Se (keV/nm) 14.28 23.25 28.27 0.Sn (keV/nm) 0.030 0.19 0.eleven 0.Rp Ysp 9.eight 7.9 11.seven 0.twelve 38.three 57.9 81.7 2.90 100 200 0.Similarly to SiO2 and ZnO, the characteristic length (LEQ ) is estimated to become 4.5, four.three and 4.1 nm for 90 MeV Ni10 , a hundred MeV Xe14 and 200 MeV Xe14 , respectively, from your empirical formula of the single-electron reduction cross-section 1L (10-16 cm2 ) of 0.56 (90 MeV Ni10 ), 0.59 (a hundred MeV Xe14 ) and 0.61 (200 MeV Xe14 ) [83,84]. Here, 1L = 1L (Fe) 1.51L (O). LEQ is a lot smaller compared to the movie thickness and the charge-state effect doesn’t come into play. Figure six shows XRD intensity degradation YXD vs. electronic stopping energy (Se ) (SRIM2013 and TRIM1997) along with the sputtering yields Ysp vs. Se . Both YXD and Ysp follow the power-law match along with the exponent working with TRIM1997 offers a somewhat more substantial match than these employing SRIM2013. The exponent of lattice disordering is two times bigger than that of sputtering (Nsp is exceptionally close to unity, in contrast on the SiO2 and ZnO situations). The adjust while in the lattice parameter appears to scatter GS-626510 Biological Activity depending on the substrate and diffraction planes, and is not proportional to your ion fluence. The typical on the lattice parameter change while in the (104) and (110) diffractions of Fe2 O3 on C-Al2 O3 is -0.two, -0.three (an estimated error of 0.1 ) and practically zero at one 1012 cm-2 for 200 MeV Xe, one hundred MeV Xe and 90 MeV Ni ion influence. The dependence with the lattice parameter alter around the ion fluence and Se is challenging, and is to get investigated.Quantum Beam Sci. 2021, 5,eleven ofFigure 6. XRD dgradation per unit fluence YXD of polycrystalline Fe2 O3 movies ( o) and sputtering yield Ysp ( , x) being a perform of the electronic stopping electrical power (Se ) in keV/nm. Power-law fits are indicated by dashed lines and Se is calculated making use of SRIM2013 and TRIM1997 (o, x): ( YXD = (0.028 Se )two.28 (SRIM2013), (o) YXD = (0.029Se )2.54 (TRIM1997), Ysp = (2.2 Se )1.05 (SRIM2013) and (x) Ysp = (one.sixteen Se )1.25 (TRIM1997). Sputtering data and power-law fit on the sputtering yields (TRIM1997) from [60].three.4. TiN The XRD patterns are shown in Figure seven for unirradiated and irradiated TiN films around the SiO2 glass substrate. As presently talked about in Part 2, (111) and (200) diffraction peaks are observed and the XRD intensity decreases due to ion impact. Figure eight displays XRD intensities normalized to people of unirradiated TiN films on SiO2 glass, C-Al2 O3 and R-Al2 O3 substrates like a perform of your ion fluence. It is seen the XRD intensity degradation is practically precisely the same to the diffraction planes of (111) and (200) on SiO2 , and for (111) on C-Al2 O3 . The XRD intensity degradation is less delicate to your ion influence for that diffraction plane (220) on the R-Al2 O3 substrate ( 30 smaller than that for (111) and (200) on SiO2 , and for (111) on C-Al2 O3 ). The XRD intensity degradation per unit fluence YXD for (111) and (200) diffractions is provided in Table 5, along with sputtering yields and stopping powers (TRIM1997 and SRIM2013). No appreciable adjust in the lattice parameter is observed, as shown in Figure seven. Similarly to the SiO2 , ZnO.