) (92.two) (7.eight) (54.3) (45.7) (23.) (76.9) (70.7) (29.three) (97.) (2.9) (76.five) (23.five) (84.0) (6.0) (4.four, 6.six) (six.3, 8.7)Pvalue was calculated applying chisquared tests. Pvalue was calculated applying MannWhitney
) (92.two) (7.eight) (54.3) (45.7) (23.) (76.9) (70.7) (29.3) (97.) (2.9) (76.five) (23.five) (84.0) (six.0) (four.four, 6.6) (six.3, 8.7)Pvalue was calculated making use of chisquared tests. Pvalue was calculated working with MannWhitney U tests.https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.tTable two. Rotated issue loadings (varimax rotation). PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114510 Guys Factor Variables Clubs for the elderly Volunteer activities Community events Hobby Friendship Communication with family members and friends https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.t002 neighborhood involvement 0.698 0.80 0.742 0.three 0.0 0.022 Factor two person relationship 0.06 0.20 0.25 0.60 0.747 0.77 Issue neighborhood involvement 0.738 0.606 0.79 0.027 0.96 0.022 Girls Aspect 2 person relationship 0.083 0.354 0.080 0.746 0.569 0.PLOS 1 https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392 April 7,six Social participation and SCH 58261 chemical information psychological distress in older adultsTable 3. Association of social participation level with psychological distress in communitydwelling older adults by age group. Model a Guys Community involvement total 659 years 704 years Person relationship total 659 years 704 years Females Neighborhood involvement total 659 years 704 years Person relationship total 659 years 704 yearsa bModel two b pvalue 0.680 0.86 0.856 0.06 0.338 0.087 0.359 0.434 0.699 0.99 0.259 0.52 0.03 0.04 0.007 0.050 0.035 0.060 0.082 0.045 0.087 0.03 0.003 0.04 95 CI 0.44 0.98 0.242 0.276 0.288 0.47 0.025 0.97 0.26 0.237 0.268 0.385 0.89 0.247 0.267 0.077 0.60 0.56 0.392 0.423 0.488 0.78 0.255 0.33 pvalue 0.790 0.826 0.923 0.267 0.574 0.370 
0.084 0.472 0.247 0.428 0.559 0.738 0.033 0.020 0.043 0.053 0.09 0.083 0.099 0.048 0.2 0.029 0.007 0.Model three c 95 CI 0.9 0.20 0.98 0.29 0.265 0.492 0.003 0.26 0.088 0.292 0.307 0.43 0.237 0.270 0.360 0.084 0.98 0.34 0.443 0.457 0.555 0.55 0.273 0.30 pvalue 0.58 0.775 0.567 0.277 0.775 0.26 0.047 0.48 0.54 0.548 0.809 0.95 CI 0.27 0.254 0.304 0.360 0.34 0.562 0.28 0.220 0.274 0.404 0.49 0.529 0.4 0.23 0.253 0.008 0.7 0.038 0.352 0.5 0.408 0.085 0.33 0.0.02 0.02 0.04 0.089 0.062 0.2 0.050 0.057 0.032 0.067 0.079 0.Model : Adjusted for age, region (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with other individuals alone), functioning (yes no) Model 2: Adjusted for age, area (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with other people alone), functioning (yes no), BMI, physical functioning (very good poor),smoking (yes no), drinking (yes no)cModel 3: Adjusted for age, location (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with others alone), operating (yes no), BMI, physical functioning (very good poor), smoking (yes no), drinking (yes no), neighborhood involvement or person connection https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.tTable four. Association of social participation level with psychological distress in communitydwelling older adults by living arrangement. Model a Guys Neighborhood involvement living with other folks living alone Person relationship living with other individuals living alone Females Community involvement living with other folks living alone Person connection living with others living alonea b cModel two b pvalue 0.784 0.853 0.08 0.699 0.597 0.4 0.002 0.265 0.007 0.055 0.048 0.086 0.065 0.200 0.078 0.258 95 CI 0.60 0.433 0.283 0.373 0.080 0.99 0.394 0.052 0.85 0.622 0.088 0.656 0.357 .300 0.043 .396 pvalue 0.886 0.76 0.300 0.577 0.23 0.46 0.6 0.035 0.024 0.06 0.046 0.078 0.0 0.85 0.02 0.Model three c 95 CI 0.40 0.598 0.288 0.484 0.002 0.22 0.473 0.033 0.228 0.653 0.03 0.739 0.468 .229 0.009 .363 pvalue 0.640 0.928 0.352 0.67 0.048 0.62 0.059 0.95 CI 0.208 0.545 0.420 0.47 0.232 0.545 0.