237 237 2922 six 22 4 0 4 five three four 43 58 226 22 226 229 220 27 3.43 0.08 9.23 Right temporal pole 50 0.88 8.68 7.63 Left medial prefrontal cortex 442 6.84 6.0 four.99 Left inferior frontal gyrus
237 237 2922 six 22 four 0 four 5 three 4 43 58 226 22 226 229 220 27 3.43 0.08 9.23 Correct temporal pole 50 0.88 8.68 7.63 Left medial prefrontal cortex 442 six.84 6.0 four.99 Left inferior frontal gyrus 68 6.40 5.52 Right cerebellum 20 5.7 Left temporoparietal junction 2 5.06 3.9 Appropriate medial cerebellum 33 5.00 Correct inferior frontal gyrus 46 four.97 four.49 Precuneus 0 4.74 three.87 c) Interaction: Social agent know-how [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] Left temporal pole 24 4.six Right superior medial prefrontal cortex 33 four.04 Left superior medial prefrontal cortex two 3.53 Left temporoparietal junction 5 3.25 254 245 5 60 5 23 22 6 25 257 24 260 248 three 48 60 23 23 25 9 29 2 26 24 23 53 53 65 20 23 282 258 258 258 23 26 252 26 two 50 32226 223 24 235 220 220 three 43 three 7 9 238 9 22 250 24 7 28 34 235 28 55The most important effect of social agent (Bodies Names) is masked by the bodylocaliser (Bodies Cars); the key impact of social know-how (Traits Neutral) is masked by the ToMlocaliser (False Beliefs False Photographs); the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19456252 agent by social knowledge interaction [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] is masked by both the physique and ToM localiser. Note: Regions 2’,3,4,4’-tetrahydroxy Chalcone chemical information surviving a voxellevel threshold of P 0.005 and 0 voxels are reported. Regions in bold survive FWE cluster correction for numerous comparisons. Subclusters at the least 8 mm in the key peak are listed. The social agent by social understanding interaction is exclusively masked by the NamesNeutral NamesTraits contrast to create certain that any interaction result doesn’t consist of (Neutral Traits) when paired with names.Neuroimaging dataUnivariate analyses. Main effects. There was a primary impact of social agent (Bodies Names; Figure 3A) in bilateral OT cortices [overlapping with Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) and surviving FWE cluster correction] and bilateral FG [overlapping withFusiform Body Region (FBA) and surviving FWE cluster correction]. There was also a major effect of social know-how (Traits Neutral; Figure 3B) in mPFC, bilateral TPs, precuneus, and left TPJ, all of which overlapped with the ToMlocaliser. The inverse contrasts for each key effects (Names Bodies and Neutral Trait) are reported in Supplementary Table S.I. M. Greven et al.Table 2. Clusters revealed within the PPI evaluation for the social agent by social understanding interaction [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)], that is masked by each the physique and ToM localiser Region Quantity T of voxels Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates x Seed region: right fusiform gyrus Appropriate temporal pole Left temporoparietal junction Left temporal pole Left temporal pole Seed area: left temporal pole Left fusiform gyrus y z 7 44.23 three.79 2.98 3.75 3.28 3.53 2.63 four.5 260 260 245 245 233 242 252 246 20 7 five 2238 9 9 223 232 226 226Note: Regions surviving a voxellevel threshold of P 0.005 and 0 voxels are reported. These outcomes are exclusively masked by the NamesNeutral NamesTraits PPI contrast to produce positive that any interaction result doesn’t include (Neutral Traits) when paired with names.Interaction. For the interaction involving social agent and social expertise [(BodiesTraits BodiesNeutral) (NamesTraits NamesNeutral)] clusters emerged in left TPJ, mPFC, and left TP and all of these clusters overlapped using the ToMlocaliser in the grouplevel (Table ; Figure 3C). The parameter estimates illustrate a greater distinction involving trait and neutral statements when bodies as opposed to names are prese.