Ex of shrubs below the reconstruction Except for ATC, ATC, the Simpson diversity shrubs under the reconstruction model of a model of a high-density pure forestforest was drastically significantlythat of Cf (Figure 3B; high-density pure forest and mixed and mixed forest was larger than larger than that of Cf (Figure 3B; one-way ANOVA, p is no important difference amongst the reconstruction one-way ANOVA, p 0.05), but there 0.05), but there’s no important difference among the reconstruction patterns of differentgradients. Relating to the Pielou evenness Pielou patterns of distinctive mixed-diversity mixed-diversity gradients. With regards to the index, the overall transformation transformation patterns of high-density pure forests are evenness index, the overallpatterns of high-density pure forests and mixedforests and drastically are than those reduced than those of 3C, one-way ANOVA, p 0.05). In mixed forestslowersignificantlyof untreated Cf (Figureuntreated Cf (Figure 3C,one-way short, for unique gradients of mixed gradients of shrub diversity, the shrub diversity ANOVA, p 0.05). In quick, for differentdiversity, the mixed diversity improvement effect beneath the LEI-106 Description two-tree beneath the two-tree mixed cultivation patterns is pure forest with a improvement effectmixed cultivation patterns may be the finest, followed by the best, followed by single tree species and, ultimately, the mixed and, with 3 mixed forest with three tree spethe pure forest having a single tree species forestfinally, the tree species and mixed cultivation. Nonetheless, inside the mixed cultivation patterns of two tree species, patterns of two tree species, cies and mixed cultivation. Even so, inside the mixed cultivationthere is no clear distinction in the diversity of shrubs amongst there is no clear difference in the mixed modes of diverse collocations. modes of difdiversity of shrubs among the mixed ferent collocations.Forests 2021, 12, FOR PEER REVIEW7 14 7 of ofShannon-Wiener diversity indexA2.0 1.five 1.0 0.5 0.cH Ts -H C sH C A TA TC A TC C f AbcbbaSimpson diversity index2.1.0 0.8 0.six 0.four 0.2 0.B a a ab ab ab a b cbc dA cH Ts -H C sHA TCTCATAPattern1.Pattern Margalef richness indexCD a ab d ePielou evenness index1.abcba de e cd ccdcdcdbc0.0.A TC cH sH TC -H C A TA C f A Ts CTs -H C sH A TC cH TC TA A A C C fPatternPatternFigure three. The diversity of shrubs among the distinct tree species element reconstruction patterns of low-efficiency Linoleoyl glycine Autophagy stands Figure three. The diversity of shrubs among the distinct tree species component reconstruction patof Cupressus of low-efficiency stands of Cupressus funebris. The diversity, (C) Pielou evenness, and (D) Margalef terns funebris. The (A) Shannon iener diversity, (B) Simpson (A) Shannon iener diversity, (B) Simpson richness indices of shrubs below diverse reconstruction patterns have been investigated. Each and every bar denotes three replicates diversity, (C) Pielou evenness, and (D) Margalef richness indices of shrubs under various recon( D). Various letters indicate substantial variations amongst different reconstruction patterns compared by Fisher’s least struction patterns had been investigated. Every single bar denotes 3 replicates (SD). Various letters indisignificant differences (LSD) test at p 0.05. Ac-H: high-density Alnus cremastogyne; Ts-H: high-density Toona sinensis; Cs-H: cate substantial differences amongst distinctive reconstruction patterns compared by Fisher’s least sighigh-density Cinnamomum septentrionale; TC: Ts Cs; CA: Cs Ac; TA: Ts Ac; ATC:.